First, let me say that I could have lived my entire life without the drama.
Second, let me say that I have tried, for the past 3 days to summon up at least a little guilt, or something similar, regarding how things went, and well, I just can't do it.
Thursday was The Election.
The meeting started out simply enough--a call to order. After that, it was straight out of a Twilight Zone episode. Honestly, it was.
Miss Thang, acting PTA prez, got pissy when asked why the balloting would be done HER way. (There were two ways to do it--all at once, or office-by-office. She chose as a whole. Nominations, close nominations, move on to next office, nominations, etc.) She does NOT like to be questioned, I'll tell you that for nothing.
So, that's the way we did it--mostly because she'd already put in a lot of effort into having those ballots done up, and, honestly, we'd have been there for quite a while doing it office-by-office.
There were no further nominations for President. Closed. First VP was just Miss Thang, and it appeared that no one was going to run against her. So I nominated the Dad. He and I have had several conversations over the past two years (his twins are the same age as the Howler) and he said the same thing I did--without my saying it to him first. She cannot run unopposed. So I dun-did it. Nominations closed. 2nd VP was Dad running unopposed. Nominations closed. 3rd VP--the officer she tried to get rid of--got one nomination from the floor. Treasurer, one guy, no other nominations. Closed. Secretary, mumple unopposed (again with the weirdness). Nominations closed. Vote time.....Miss Thang stressed that write-ins were allowed. Wonder why ~snark~
Business was conducted while we waited for copies of the ballots to be made, and we had a lovely social 20 minutes while ballots were tabulated by 3 non-office running members.
A great deal of what hit Miss Thang's last nerve was that the person who was the vendor for two of the fundraisers we did this year (who is also a member of our PTA) stood up, and in telling us how much was raised, even comparing the fall and the spring totals. She also shared with the group some of HER opinions on how SHE was treated, and what's she's been hearing from others--in email, notes, and conversations. She really blasted the Prez, who is still laid up (I'm still trying to wrap my head around being able to go to Disney World in January--a few short weeks after breaking that leg--but not being able to roll herself in to a meeting) and then turned on Miss Thang. Miss Thang, apparently, really has been upholding the Don't Call Us/We Have No Intention of Calling You policy, and made no attempt to actually step up and do the work her laid up predecessor left her.
Sure, she showed up and did the things that would earn her attention. All efforts, seen in hindsight, show that she basically enjoyed the "being seen" part of the job.
What I've heard in the past few months has been that, overall, she's really done no better, though. I've gotten practically immediate responses from her, but I'm assuming that's because I have what would probably be called Perceived Power. She perceived, back in December, that I would speak up about things I saw as wrong, stupid, or both. She perceived, back in January, that I am (God Help Me) a leader--and, someone who is willing to take a risk. She perceived, last Thursday, that I am willing to stick my neck out, in front of her, to drive a point home (I'll get to that.) She's also pissed that the rest of peons actually speak to each other, and have open and honest conversations.
I've realized that a big part of the problem with this PTA isn't just the funnelling of information to a few people who refuse to share the information or take action themselves, but a lack of trust amongst its members. Who can you trust when the powers-that-be seem to know that you've spoken out against them, and they blackball you?
Well, who you can trust is me. I'm not very nice, deep down, but you never have to guess where you stand with me, and not only will I not repeat what you say to me, I'll let you sit next to me, even if I think you're a nutbar. (Seriously, if we're all in the PTA to make the school a better place for our kids, your--or my--being a nutbar really isn't the point, unless one of us does something really super strange, and even then, I'm willing to forget it unless you get arrested while I'm watching.)
So, over the course of the last few months, more people have been showing up, getting involved and just plain speaking up.
The meeting also involved Miss Thang being informed that her plans for the end of the year picnic were just plain stupid. Ok, nobody said, "Stupid" but it was made clear that if you're going to spend a few hundred dollars of PTA funds on t-shirts, the KIDS should get 'em, NOT faculty and staff. We all appreciate the faculty and staff, and what they do for our kids, but seriously. Spend the PTA funds on the KIDS. It's a no-brainer, really.
The election results were tabulated by 3 volunteers--none of whom were running for office. Thank God.
There were 31 members present--that's DOUBLE what's been showing up otherwise. 16 votes needed to elect.
Miss Thang got 7 votes for Prez; 6 for 1st VP. Of course, everyone else got their 16. Including Dad, who was now in the position of holding two offices. And since that's "illegal" under our by-laws, he had to choose. He tried to be nice about it, and didn't just jump on the 1st VP thing, and while he was talking and saying basically that he wanted to do a good job, and would do which ever one everyone else thought he should. She snapped, "You have to PICK ONE!" So he did. And she lost for a third time.
2nd VP was now open, and she wasn't nominated. I honestly think that she decided before the meeting that she would have president or nothing at all. Her resignation implies it, even though she claims she's been considering it for months now, because we've all been so mean to her. And she was professional the entire time (of course, professionals pitch flaming asshole tantrums all the time, donchano) and that she has to be true to herself.
She says that
"I am excusing myself from anymore invalid information about me since I do not deserve it nor did I do anything to provoke it." (and if there's anyone out there who can explain that to me, please please please do so) because, you know,
not calling people back, playing the blame game, pitching tantrums, going along with the blackballing, manipulating, lying, and yelling when asked legitimate questions during a meeting, having access to other nominees bio information and writing your bio in obvious response to it, and assuming--and stating so in writing--that since YOU don't know anything about anyone here means no one else knows anyone else either, sending harassing emails to other PTA officers, is definitely not provoking.
Finally, I'd like to say that no where in this entire post did I mention that her speech patterns show a definite need for speech therapy (buy a freaking hard consonant already!), and her "professionalism" extends to bizarre sentence structure, abused punctuation, lack of coherent thought processes, and a generally entitled attitude have earned her a very special place in the annals of would be tyrants.